Martin Messier

April 19, 2023

Since you're learning Neurolinguistic Programming, you'll find it worthwhile to focus your efforts on the skills that will result in your greatest competence in the shortest amount of time. In this article I'll list 5 NLP skills that you should constantly focus on developing.

So let's look immediately at the first one:

1. The Number 1 NLP Skill

This one is described in detail in the free dailyNLP Academy course The Number 1 NLP Skill You Must Master. If you haven't yet, request your free report by filling out the form on the top right of your screen. I must insist! Learn and master this skill and your overall competence will soar!

2. Calibration

This skill enables you to read people's mind. Have you ever met someone who claimed to know how you were feeling or what you were thinking but was completely wrong? This happened because that person didn't calibrate to your state appropriately. Calibration is the process by which you link a person's state to the physiology being displayed at any point in time. You'll see spectacular calibration taking place at the World Poker Championships. Each poker player is constantly looking for other players' "tells", the little quirky behaviors that give away how they're feeling about their cards, whether they're bluffing or they have a strong game.

3. Detecting patterns

NLP revolves around patterns. As such, to be a successful NLP Practitioner, you must always look out for patterns. But what exactly is a pattern? Let's allow Gregory Bateson, one of the godfathers of NLP, to answer that question (as taken from Whispering in the Wind, by John Grinder and Carmen Bostic St Clair):

any aggregate of events or objects (e.g. a sequence of phonemes, a painting, or a frog or a culture) shall be said to contain a "redundancy" or a "pattern" if the aggregate can be divided in any way by a "slash mark" such that an observer perceiving only what is on one side of the slash mark can guess with better than random success, what is on the other side of the slash mark.... Or, again from the point of view of a cybernetic observer, the information available on one side of the slash will restrain) i.e. reduce the probability of) wrong guessing.

This simply means that when you can predict from one piece of behavior what will happen next, you have detected a pattern. For example, let's say you notice that every time your uncle comes home, he immediately heads to the kitchen to have a cup of tea. You observe this behavior once, twice, three times and yet again. The next time your uncle arrives at home, you predict he will head to the kitchen to have a cup of tea - and he does! Congratulations! You have detected a pattern.

Now you must apply this skill to detecting the patterns of excellence of outstanding performers.

4. Questioning

The quality of the information you can gather directly correlates to the quality of question you ask. Work on your questioning skills constantly? How can you become more precise? How can you become more involving? What specifically does the other person mean when she says "just feel the beat"? The Meta-Model offers simple and useful tools that will assist you in beefing up your questioning skills. I'll talk about the Meta-Model in greater detail soon.

5. Reading eye accessing cues

If you haven't yet come across information on eye accessing cues, do a search on Google for the phrase "eye accessing cues." I believe that only NLP uses such terminology to describe this skill. Once you master reading eye accessing cues, you'll effectively track the thinking process of those you interact with. You'll be able to understand whether they're accessing their visual, auditory or kinesthetic channel.

Of course these aren't the only skills you must exercise to develop your NLP skills. These five answers offer a solid pointer as to where you should focus your attention.

Practice! Every day!

Martin Messier

April 18, 2023

To make sense out of the mish-mash of NLP-related material you will go through, you'll find it useful to categorize the areas of activities tied to NLP.

This article will be very short and to the point but nevertheless one of the most important I will post. The distinctions you learn in this one will allow you to map out your areas of learning in NLP.

With that said, let's get to our 4 areas:

1. NLP Modeling

This is THE main area of NLP, as I've constantly harped on since starting this blog. NLP You're modeling any time you're coding behavioral patterns into explicit strategies or models, more specifically the behavior of geniuses who produce outstanding results in a specific field. You can also be said to be modeling when you craft useful descriptions or maps of phenomena that you observe (for instance, eye movements tied to the use of a specific representational system).

2. NLP Design

As you become more proficient in modeling, you will inevitably be drawn to design. You are designing any time you're using NLP variables to create new patterns with the intent of producing a specific result. For example, you might design a specific sequence of sentences that trigger specific sensory channels whose goal is to persuade a client to buy a house.

3. NLP Installation

Installation has to do with the actual "Programming" of NLP. You're installing whenever you're transferring, conditioning or programming a pattern in yourself or another person using anchoring, hypnotic language, chaining states or any combination of the former. For instance, you're installing when you run someone through a swish pattern.

4. NLP Training

Training deals with teaching specific skills to a student. Either you're training or you're being trained. You're training whenever you're explaining, describing or exemplifying a specific pattern or model for a student to learn how apply that specific pattern or model. While writing or reading this blog can't exactly be considered training, it would fall in this generic category. This is what we've been doing together all along.

Now, don't take all of this for cash. These categories don't really exist. I just made them up because they make learning NLP much easier. They help you to understand what's going on and serve as a crutch to make sense of the patterning coming your way.

Ideally, as you progress in learning NLP, you'll create your own categories (your models). Please share your models with other learners as it will enrich and stimulate your learning even more.

Martin Messier

April 17, 2023

Javi just sent me an email asking me to comment on that.

He read my exchange with Fatih in a previous article (you'll find it in the comment section) that resulted in Fatih resolving an issue he'd been struggling with for some time, on which he'd spent serious time and cash.

During the exchange, I said:

Pay close attention here. There was an “IF … THEN … ” link, but it didn’t exist in your nervous system as language. It was a straight sensory connection. This plays a big part in what kind of question will unlock new choices.

Javi asked me a few questions about this. Here are my answers for everyone's benefit.

"How do you know when there is a sensory connection and when there isn´t?"

Javi added: "(as I see this, there is always a sensory connections, the person is always feeling in some way the beliefs he has, and when he express his beliefs using language, that sensory connections is always there)"

Javi's right. Linguistic links are always stacked on top of sensory links. Always. Keep that in mind.

So linguistic links can't exist without sensory links. But sensory links can exist without linguistic links.

It's like atoms and molecules. You can't have molecules without atoms, but you can have atoms without molecules.

So what's the give away? What reveals whether the link is sensory or linguistic?

The answer lies in THE WAY the person describes what's happening.

Specifically, Fatih wrote:

Whenever somebody disagrees with me on something, I immediately feel “They must know it better than me, so I’m wrong about what I know.”

He first describes an external trigger (somebody disagrees with me). That trigger cues a feeling that he labeled "They must know it better than me".

Notice how the external cue went straight to the feeling (I didn't say emotion).

In NLP jargon, you'd call that an anchor. External stimulus --> Internal response

It's a gut feeling. No thinking involved. No rationalization. It just happens. It's prelinguistic.

It's also not cause and effect. It's not "if somebody disagrees with me, then I respond in that way." It's "When somebody disagress with me, I immediately feel..." It's instantaneous.

On the other hand, when Fatih writes: "They must know it better than me, so I'm wrong about what I know."

That's an internal linguistic link, and it's clearly articulated as such. "They know it better than me" means that "I'm wrong about what I know".

It's a complex equivalence between two ideas, two thoughts. Read this sentence carefully: "I'm wrong about what I know." Is there any sensory element in here?

Nope.

So this second link is definitely coded purely in language. Much easier to manipulate and play with. Probably no sensory grounding whatsoever in this link. So it's weak.

If it wasn´t a sensory connection, what type of question would you use then?

I actually used both types of questions in my intervention.

The first question I asked was:

When someone knows something better than you, what else could it mean?

This first question targets the linguistic link, the complex equivalence.

Fatih believed that "someone knows something better than me" means "I'm wrong about what I know".

My question invites him to substitute the second element of the link ("I'm wrong about what I know") with a new choice. Based on his Model of The World, Fatih can choose any number of possibilities:

"Someone knows something better than me" means "Wow! I can learn something new now!"

or

"Someone knows something better than me" means "Now I can focus on my core talent."

So that question addresses that link. Fortunately, Fatih made an empowering choice.

The second instruction I gave was to:

Wonder: What’s great about someone disagreeing with me?

This question targets the anchor. The sensory association.

It links the external cue (someone disagreeing with me) to an internal feeling. And the word "great" presupposes that "someone disagreeing with me" triggers a great feeling.

Once again, the question invites Fatih to come up with additional choices, bound by the "great" criterion. The cool thing is that Fatih had no problem in coming up with an empowering answer.

Here's how you reengineer sensory anchors

Remember. The structure here is "External trigger --> Internal feeling".

You simply ask:

What's ***emotion*** about ***trigger***?

What's exciting about speaking on the phone?

What's funny about returning merchandise to the store?

What's relaxing about approaching an attractive person?

What's stupid about running red lights?

Here's how you reengineer complex equivalences

The structure here is "Idea #1= Idea #2"

In Fatih's case, it was "someone knows something better than me = I'm wrong about what I know".

You ask:

When ***Idea #1***, what else could it mean?

When you get a bad grade on the test, what else could it mean?

When you make a mistake, what else could it mean?

When you forget about a birthday, what else could it mean?

Recap: this is simply...

Reframing.

Now go do it.

Martin Messier

April 13, 2023

I get this question all the time.

You might even have wondered about that yourself sometime back.

I scoured the internet quickly to see what “experts” had to say on the topic. Didn’t really find anything all that enlightening so I decided to write up an answer for you here.

First, let’s talk about Neurolinguistic Programming (NLP).

As I’ve written about extensively in other articles, the field of NLP centers on the modeling of outstanding performers, those people who produce astonishing results in a variety of fields.

In NLP, we want to figure out how Ronaldinho dribbles, how Kobe Bryant decides to pass the ball, how Barack Obama mesmerizes the public in his speeches, or how a Cirque du Soleil artist performs a brilliant feat.

While many beginning students and outsiders mistake Neurolinguistic Programming (NLP) as a therapeutic modality, it goes way beyond that. The reason for this confusion is that the co-founders of the field initially modeled outstanding therapists, notably Fritz Perls, Milton Erickson and Virginia Satir.

To be able to accurately describe these models, John Grinder and Richard Bandler developed an epistemology, or a formal “code”, for how human beings process sensory information they gather from the world around them. This code flows all the way from how we pick up sensory cues to how we use language to manipulate our perceptions and communicate them to others. This code is Neurolinguistic Programming, or NLP.

So modeling is the end game and NLP is the tool that makes it happen. It’s a language, a code, a formal way of describing and coding human phenomena that you’re modeling. In the same way that mathematicians express themselves in equations, symbols, algorithms and so forth, trained modelers of human behavior express themselves in representational systems, accessing cues, strategies, four-tuples, states and TOTEs.

You can then take these models – these instruction sets or codes – and apply them in a variety of fields (psychotherapy being only one of them). You can leverage coded models in business communication, leadership, sales, team building, sports training, and so forth and so on.

NLP is methodology and a code. Nothing else.

This is why the idea that “NLP will solve all your problems” is bogus. It would be the same as saying that C++ will eliminate all viruses from your computer. You can use NLP to create problems in the same way that you can use C++ to create viruses.

Think of hypnosis as a word that labels an altered state (both mental and physiological). People commonly associate hypnosis with the notion of “sleep”, which has a lot to do with the fact that Hypnos is the God of Sleep in Greek mythology. The truth is, the hypnotic state is rather a state of heightened awareness and suggestibility than a “sleeping” state.

Someone experiencing hypnosis has shifted his or her attention and awareness from common patterns to new or inhabitual patterns, which may be more focused or peripheral, depending on the person’s habitual state.

What characterizes hypnosis is the shift from usual patterns of awareness.

We achieve hypnosis through induction. We can induce the hypnotic state through verbal commands or suggestions, or through non-verbal, sensory input, that leads us or our subject into the altered state. Induction is a SKILL that you can learn and master. There are several different types of induction and each can be leveraged in different contexts to produce a desired result.

So, in this case, hypnosis is a state and induction is the process to get there.

Let’s get back to the difference between NLP and hypnosis.

Hypnosis is an altered state you attain through induction. Induction is a process that can be performed using a variety of methods, which can be learned like any other skill. The most effective way to master the skill is to model a master of induction. You can then document your model using NLP, the code or language developed specifically to document the fruits of a modeling project.

Does it make more sense now?

Martin Messier

April 12, 2023

My last post spawned some interesting discussions around the issue of emotional mastery.

Let me share a bit more about my experience and see if this resonates with you.

I used to believe that I SHOULDN’T feel a certain way in certain circumstances. For instance, I shouldn’t feel angry when someone criticizes me or tells me they don’t like something I’ve done.

For some reason, I believed that it’s not spiritual to feel that way, or that everyone is entitled to their opinion, or whatever else.

You have to get the message.

But the truth is that that anger is just a message. It’s a pointer.

And I only have to feel it as long as necessary for me to get the message.

Trying to repress our emotions as a form of emotional mastery is similar to try to shut down your phone system because telemarketers are bothering you.

Sure, telemarketers will call your home, but so will your best friends. If you cut off the phone, you knock out your communication with your buddies as well.

The instant you perceive emotions as a messaging system, you move on to the second step: learning to interpret the message accurately so that you can take effective action (once again, either realign your values or realign your circumstances).

What about long-lasting disempowering emotions?

Cherry commented on my previous post: “The problem is – and this is what I want to hear more about emotional mastery – is that this anger of mine won’t go away for hours. Any ideas on how to save hours and hours of negative, unproductive emotions?”

When modeling people who feel anger or resentment for long periods of time, I’ve found that this stems from a belief that has a “should” in it. “People shouldn’t do this” or “this should be different” or “I shouldn’t have to do this” and so forth and so on.

The word “should” has a peculiar effect on our nervous system. It disengages us from reality. Moreover, the problem with “should” is that we can’t do anything about it. It totally disempowers us.

Think about it for a second.

“People shouldn’t treat me this way.”

Perhaps, but they do. Whatcha gonna do about it?

“This is line shouldn’t take this long.”

Perhaps, but it is taking this long. What now?

“Shoulds” create endless loops in our nervous systems and we cycle stress through them.

So what’s the antidote?

The instant you either take action or realign your values, the loop ends. No “shoulds” anymore. All taken care of.

“Yeah, but I shouldn’t have to realign my values or take action…”

I rest my case.

Martin Messier

April 11, 2023

My email address has been down for some time now. Just discovered that today.

And I was wondering why I was getting no email for the past couple of days...

Don't you get pissed when that kind of stuff happens to you?

I sure do.

Which brings me to something important about learning and mastering NLP: emotional mastery.

When I first started learning NLP, I believed that from that moment on, I should be able to feel the way I wanted, whenever I wanted, and that I should have absolute control over my emotions.

As I progressed, I discovered this was the farthest thing from the truth.

In fact, whatever emotion comes up serves only as a messaging system that lets you know what you're currently living isn't aligned with your values.

EDIT: whatever "painful" emotion comes up. Thanks for pointing that out, Mike.

So now, when I start feeling bad, it's only a matter of seconds before I figure out what my system is trying to tell me.

And then the solution comes easy: take action or change your values.

One or the other.

No way around it.

Let me know if you'd like to learn more about this by posting some comments here below and I'll give you some really good stuff.

Martin Messier

April 10, 2023

Here's a technique I learned from Danie Beaulieu that's unmatched for dealing with self-esteem issues, mainly for cases of people who have been psychologically battered by others (I mean "battered" in the figurative sense).

Here's how to run the protocol with your client:

  1. Grab some money (I personally love hundred dollar bills).
  2. Show the bill to your client.
  3. Ask: "How much is this worth?" This will interrupt the client's pattern. Your client will say "One hundred dollars."
  4. Then, crumple up the money, spit on it (optional), toss it behind you and then step on it.
  5. Ask your client: "Do you feel like that at times?" and observe your client's reaction.
  6. Pick up the money, open it up with care and attention, and show it to your client once more.
  7. Ask: "How much is this worth now?"
  8. Client will answer: "One hundred dollars."
  9. Hold out the bill in front of your client so (s)he can see it clearly. Future pace by saying: "And anytime you see a hundred dollar bill, no matter what's happened to it, you'll remember that it's still worth the exact same."

This experiential metaphor is incredibly powerful. Allow the client to go through the experience and draw his/her own conclusions without explaining anything.

Do you know anyone who got run over by life and needs a self-esteem boost? Test this pattern and let us know in the comments how it worked out.

Martin Messier

April 6, 2023

In Whispering In The Wind, John Grinder describes how he designed an experience to assist a woman in licking cancer.

Here’s the story in a nutshell: during his conversation with her, she repeated a few times that, for her to get over cancer, “her whole world would have to turn upside down”. Grinder then proceeded to arrange an acrobatic flight for his client with a pilot friend of his.

His client went into remission.

Now, let’s be VERY clear here…

I AM NOT SAYING THAT NLP SERVES AS A MAGIC BULLET THAT WILL SOLVE EVERY PROBLEM IN HUMANITY. IT IT NOT THE PANACEA THAT SOME PEOPLE MAKE IT OR WANT IT TO BE. THIS MIGHT NOT WORK IN EVERY CASE. IT MIGHT HAVE WORKED BY LUCK.

Now that we’re over with the NLP-religion disclaimer, let’s move on.

What I find interesting in the example is the possibility to impact neurology and belief systems through the keen design of concrete life experiences.

If you want a gajillion more examples like this one, you MUST read Phoenix, a book written by David Gordon about Milton Erickson’s behavioral patterns of intervention — which are, in my opinion, as interesting if not more than his hypnosis work.

The problem with talking in therapy is that it’s talk and it requires rapport and trust in the content and/or process being offered to you by the therapist (I know, I know, we don’t do content in NLP).

The power of real experience in NLP

Now, real experiences provide UNDENIABLE material the client is now FORCED to assimilate and process.

If someone you believe to be your enemy saves your life, the impact on your neurology will significantly differ from someone else telling you: “Deep down, he’s a good guy…”

It’s the significant difference between building products from specs vs. building products from prototypes.

Every belief is grounded in references. A reference is either:

  1. Real live experience
  2. Hallucinated experience
  3. Another set of beliefs (for which the same analysis holds)

Needless to say, beliefs built from real live experiences have infinitely more power than those of hallucinated experiences. You can use the second as a piggyback to get to the first, but nothing beats having the first.

Imagine an athlete who wants to develop the belief “I can win races”. He can visualize all day to build his confidence, but eventually, he’ll have to win a race for the belief to take root.

Why games are so effective in NLP

Another set of experiential devices you can  design to effect transformation is games.

Games offer microcosms, experiential metaphors, of real life situations in which new learnings are needed.

For instance, the game Cash Flow by Robert Kiyosaki offers a brilliant metaphor of the path to take to achieve financial independence. And all this learning happens without you having to “believe” in anything except in your ability to achieve it.

The game itself teaches you.

The same holds for the New Code games designed by John Grinder. What’s most interesting about those is that many of them generate kinesthetic learning, often lacking in our development.

Nothing beats experience

Nothing, and I mean nothing, beats real, live experience.

How can you apply this principle to your own life and in your coaching of your peers and/or children?

Martin Messier

April 5, 2023

When you start learning NLP, one of the terms that will soon come up is anchoring.

Wow!

New word!

What could this possibly mean?

John Grinder and Carmen Bostic St Clair, in their book “Whispering In The Wind”, state the following:

Grinder and Bandler were alert enough to appreciate that the choice of terms in this new universe of discourse for the meta discipline NLP had to meet certain criteria. First of all, these terms had to be relatively transparent to the user.1 Secondly, if they were to use terms already associated with some of the phenomena in psychology and more specifically, in clinical psychology, they would drag along with them unwanted and undesirable associations.

For example, we would be hard pressed to argue convincingly for the term anchoring in lieu of the term conditioning except for precisely the unwanted and undesirable theoretical baggage the term conditioning has attached to it. [[the bolding of terms is mine]]

Grinder and Bandler’s solution was the creation of a vocabulary (in some cases) wholly unassociated with previous work to allow a fresh perspective on the patterning being coded. History will determine whether this was an effective solution to the issue they confronted.

What Grinder and Bostic St Clair reveal here is that, essentially, anchoring = classic conditioning, at least in the co-founders’ minds when they set the term.

I’m sure you’ve heard of Pavlov’s famous experiment with dogs.

Anchoring works quite the same way. Perhaps a bit more sophisticated, since human beings are more sophisticated than dogs.

In a nutshell, we use anchoring in NLP to elicit desired responses from people. When I say “desired”, it can be either by the subject or by the practitioner, depending on the type of relationship developed.

OK, so what exactly is anchoring?

Anchoring, generally speaking, consists in associating an external stimulus to an internal response.

Wow, jargon. Let’s go with concrete examples…

Example 1: associating a touch on the shoulder with the person’s feeling of happiness

Example 2: associating a certain look on your face to the person’s state of laughter

Example 3: associating a certain song with a moment in a person’s life

Starting to figure it out?

External stimulus —> Internal response (which can be a feeling, a thought, a belief, and so forth)

An anchor is like a button you can push to summon back specific states. It’s kind of like an icon on the desktop of your computer. All you have to do is double-click on it to bring forth the program with which it is associated.

Same goes with a link on a webpage. Click on it and you’ll bring forth the webpage to which it links.

How does anchoring work exactly?

Anchoring happens naturally and constantly in our lives.

Stop for a second and think of a song you’ve heard a lot in your life.

If you have it, stop reading for a second, go listen to it and then come back.

What happened?

Your mind started drifting back to the times when that song was playing, didn’t it? Could you remember one of the first times you heard that song?

That’s a great example of anchoring. We do all the time. As one of my trainers said, “You cannot not anchor.”

Any external stimulus can summon back memories and associations. Songs, specific smells (like freshly baked bread or pies), temperature, textures, among others, are common examples of anchors that operate in your life.

Hmmmmm, anchoring and calibrating are really close…

Yes they are.

If you’ve read any of my previous posts on calibration, or have previous experience with NLP, you know that calibrating consists in observing the association between an external cue in someone’s behavior and an internal process.

Close, isn’t it?

Calibration enables you to take note of already established internal anchors within someone.

It also enables you to get the timing right in effectively setting an anchor.

Before you can master anchoring, you’ll need to have mastered calibration.

Some practice drills

OK, let’s try some exercises, shall we?

  1. When you hang out with a friend, pay close attention to the shifting of their states. Pick one empowering state, such as laughter. When you see them laughing out loud, open your eyes, mouth and face wide open while looking at them in a playful way. Do this naturally, without really forcing it or trying to call their attention to it, otherwise you might interrupt their pattern. The next time (s)he laughs, do it again. Then a third time. Afterwards, do a quick test… Open your eyes, mouth and face widely and observe if you can get the laughter response.
  2. Watch George Carlin clips on YouTube. Carlin, and many other stand-up comics for that matter of fact, use anchoring to elicit laughter from their audience. Watch a few, identify the anchors he uses and post the link and the video time when he uses an anchor in the comment section of this post.
  3. Create an anchor for yourself for laughter. Figure out a way to make yourself laugh on command. Then tell us how you do it so we can make you laugh as well!

In closing…

Anchoring is an essential part of your toolkit. It takes playing around to figure out how it works.

I fidgeted a lot with anchoring at the beginning. Didn’t really get it. I tried to copy other people’s style of anchoring without success. It took me some time to understand that each of us anchors others naturally and in our own way.

Take all the time you need to figure out yours.

You’ll be glad you did.

Martin Messier

April 3, 2023

Mark asked:

"I've read about propulsion systems before but I don't really understand what they are. Could you explain a bit more?"

Building a machine

Richard Bandler, to my knowledge, first developed the concept of a propulsion system and the pattern to install them. When asked about the difference between DHE and NLP, one of the differences he mentioned had to do with motivation. He said that, in NLP, practitioners worked to elicit and amplify motivation strategies. In DHE, practitioners installed powerful propulsion systems.

One way to hallucinate an understanding of the propulsion system is to think of those roller coaster rides we've been experiencing in amusement parks for about a decade now, built with electromagnets. These "new" systems make it possible for a roller coaster to get going at top speed, instead of the usual slow climb, followed by the steep downhill run.

A motivation strategy follows a step-by-step sequence that gets you from one state to a motivated state. You would follow that strategy anytime you'd like to feel motivated.

A propulsion system, on the other hand, is an installed mechanism that maintains you constantly in a state of movement - or so says its creator/developer.

So the real question for us, now, is to understand what they are and/or how they work.

The best way to do this is to actually install one and then analyze how it works. I've actually uploaded a little installation example for you, so you can simply click on the "Play" button below and get a feel for it. (At the beginning, you'll hear me say "Steve here." I recorded this when I used my pen name "Steve Bauer.")

Let's break this down a bit...

You'll notice in the audio that we're working with attraction and aversion. Both are powerful forces to move human beings.

The most simple analogy I can use for the propulsion system is the following: put heaven in front of you and hell behind you.

Heaven should be enough to pull us forward. Problem is, sometimes we get lazy. As attractive as the vision of the promised land might be, we may sometimes foolishly believe that it requires too much effort to get there. So we stop.

Now, when we have hell catching up to us unless we move forward, it becomes a little less comforting to settle down. That's why a critical piece of the propulsion system is a raging pit bull on our rear end.

My uncle once asked me: "What's the fastest animal on the planet?"

I answered: "The cheetah."

He then said: "No way! Put a cheetah on my tail and you'll see I'm the fastest animal on the planet!"

In summary...

Progress is a conquest.

It is not inevitable.

A propulsion system is a tool you can leverage to give yourself an extra "humpf!" in your quest to produce results.